See below, my letter to Andrew Gwynne on 21 January. As parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Public Health & Prevention, he is responsible for health protection with COVID-19 cited at the top of the list.
Click the vid link below (uploaded today) to see evidence that Gwynne is very much aware that SARS2 is an airborne virus 👇
https://x.com/TheCovidCoverUp/status/1887584549292679295
21 January 2025
Dear Mr Gwynne
I hope this finds you and
yours well.
I’m writing in response
to your letter to Tim Farron MP, on behalf of his constituent, Anne McConway,
widely shared on social media. I'm a
journalist writing predominantly for the Irish Independent. I've also written
for the Guardian, UK Independent, New Statesman and others.
I have consistently covered the ongoing SARS-CoV-2
pandemic from the start. A recent column focusing on SARS2 harms to children
& schools was read aloud at the UK Covid inquiry. I
have access to the world's leading scientific experts on SARS2 (the ones that
have been consistently right) and am happy to connect you with them. I covered the recent module (3) of the UK Covid inquiry examining the impact
of the pandemic on healthcare. Duty bound by accuracy and public interest, I am
compelled to fact check some of the claims made in your letter (no doubt
unwittingly), specifically in relation to Dr Lisa Ritchie, the UKHSA and the
WHO.
Firstly,
the RCN recently reported members being depressed and demoralised describing conditions
in hospitals as worse than during the pandemic. Fact check: We’re still during
the pandemic. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is not
over.
Baroness Hallett (Covid inquiry chair) stated that it’s not a question of if another
pandemic will
strike, but when.
Given the UK recorded among the highest Covid-19 healthcare worker deaths in the world, what lessons
have been learned?
Starting
with a summary of Dr Lisa Ritchie’s testimony. Currently, National Deputy
Director of Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) at NHS England, previously
head of IPC at NHS England and chair of the Covid IPC cell, Dr Ritchie insisted that senior clinicians did not provide
evidence that SARS-CoV-2 was airborne and, had they done so, the cell’s
position would have moved. False. In June 2021, over
17 professional bodies and unions, including CATA,
the BMA and RCN challenged the IPC droplet dogma in a meeting with government
and health officials. Their clinical expertise, and scientific evidence was
disregarded. It still is.
Professor
Clive Beggs, one of the inquiry’s expert witness on
physical sciences
testified that, “the overwhelming scientific evidence strongly indicates that
the inhalation of infectious aerosol particles is the dominant route”. Beggs
documents that this has been the WHO’s position since December 2021. He cites
the recent publication of the WHO’s “Indoor airborne
risk assessment in the context of SARS-CoV-2”
tool
to inform mitigation measures for healthcare centres and others, to “reduce the
unacceptable and unnecessary health burden resulting from the airborne
transmission of respiratory pathogens, like SARS-CoV-2”. Recent WHO advice stated: “ Protect loved ones
from Covid: Stay home if sick. Test, get boosted, ventilate, mask around
others.”
When reminded that professor
Beggs presented unequivocal evidence (35 studies) that SARS-CoV-2 is airborne,
Ritchie was asked if her position remained that the primary mode of transmission
for Covid-19 is droplets and
contact? Reply: That’s my position. The inquiry
failed to ask a critical follow up: Where is your corroborating evidence? As Baroness Hallett pointed out,
if airborne transmission is shown to play any role in transmission,
surely the precautionary principle should be invoked, i.e. mitigating against
both droplet AND airborne spread? I would be grateful if you could confirm
whether you have asked Dr Ritchie to present the scientific studies
underpinning her opinion, given it’s at odds with that of the WHO and
settled science? I would be grateful for a copy of same.
In her testimony, professor Jenny Harries, chief
executive of UKHSA, previously Deputy Chief Medical Officer for England, accepted
that airborne transmission does happen (apparently at odds with Dr
Ritchie’s position) but denies the need for FFP3s, claiming Covid is the same
as flu now. False. A recent
study showed the risk of death from Covid-19 is 35%
greater than for the flu, we vaccinate children against flu
but not SARS-CoV-2. In
2022, over six times as many children died from Covid than flu in the US. Ireland
includes Covid-19 infection as a risk factor for blood clots. Not flu. Flu is
seasonal, SARS2 is omnipresent putting constant pressure on healthcare. In
October, while the inquiry was underway, it was reported that A&Es in
England experienced their busiest October on record, citing Covid disruption. NHS leaders warned of
“more winter pressure than ever before”. Yet, hospital IPC guidance was not updated to
include airborne mitigations, as recommended by the inquiry experts (see
below). A meta-analysis of studies showed that
hospital-acquired Covid infection increases
the death rate by 30%. For immunocompromised patients, that is doubled. What is your plan to make
access to healthcare safe, particularly for the clinically vulnerable?
Harries
indicated that recommending routine use of FFP3s was unnecessary, invoking IPC
experts’ testimony. False. The experts actually testified that IPC
guidance should be updated to recommend routine FFP3 use in treating patients with Covid, flu and
other respiratory viruses. In May, A comprehensive
review, analysing 400
studies provided strong evidence that respirators in particular,
worn consistently and correctly, are effective at reducing respiratory
infections like Covid. Ben, an NHS doctor,
contracted SARS2 at work in April 2020, having been forced to replace his FFP3
respirator for a flimsy surgical mask. Disabled by long-Covid, unable to work,
Ben faces financial destitution. He’s currently on suicide watch.
On
children and long-Covid, Harries claimed that only a small number of children
are impacted by it. False. In August, a study found that 20% of children aged 6-11 and 14%
of teens have long-Covid. Numbers rising with every wave.
Testimony
of Professor Susan
Hopkins: UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) chief medical adviser, former deputy
director of Public Health England’s national infection service. Regarding long-Covid
she claimed: “We don’t
understand enough
about it to give the right messaging”. False. We know that long-Covid is
a debilitating disease with no cure and, risk of developing it increases with
every infection.
Recent long-Covid
research estimated that up to the end of last year, 400
million people of all ages, regardless of health status, have long-Covid,
leading to an annual global economic toll of $1trn. Author Dr Ziyad Al-Aly
warns that long-Covid affects nearly every organ system, including
cardiovascular, immune and nervous system, describing it as, “the defining
health crisis of our time”. There are many studies, all bad. It’s Hopkins’ duty
to be informed, especially given around 34% of healthcare workers in England are suffering from long-Covid.
A BMA survey showed 1 in 5 doctors (respondents) are unable to work because
of the disease which the WHO predicts will cause a
mass disabling event. Around 2
million people in the UK have long-Covid. According to the
latest ONS Covid Infection
Survey in March, a third of long-Covid sufferers are new cases since March
2023.
Hopkins
also claimed that the evidence for FFP3 masks being more effective than
surgical masks at infection protection is 'weak” beyond the
laboratory. False. When Cambridge’s Addenbrooke hospital upgraded masks on Covid-19
wards to FFP3, hospital-acquired Covid-19 infections dropped by up to 100pc
among workers.
The evidence shows that UK IPC guidance remains
fundamentally flawed, based on debunked droplet dogma, sidelining the
scientific consensus that SARS-CoV-2 is airborne. The UK’s IPC guidance is,
therefore, based on a false premise. What follows is a cascade of flawed
measures, focusing on handwashing and surgical masks instead of ventilation and
FFP3 respirators.
With
one pandemic ongoing and another expected, it’s clear that the individuals responsible
for the past and ongoing reported mishandling of the current pandemic appear to
have learned no lessons. As Parliamentary
Under-Secretary of State for Public Health and Prevention, including pandemic
preparedness, you are responsible for ensuring scientifically literate, competent professionals are at the helm,
communicating clear public health messaging. That is, airborne mitigations
against airborne viruses work. Cleaning indoor air, testing, isolation and
respirator masks are part of the solution (in addition to broadening vaccine
eligibility). Health care workers are depressed, demoralised and many incapacitated/disabled
by long-Covid now. If another pandemic is added to the mix, how can an
already traumatised, depleted workforce be expected to cope? Shouldn’t
protecting healthcare workers from repeated SARS2 infections (& other
airborne viruses) be part of government’s pandemic preparedness plan? To start building
back NHS workforce resilience?
I
look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience.
With
kind regards & huge appreciation.
Tess
Finch-Lees