If Female Labour MPs Want to Tackle Misogyny They Should Denounce Austerity Not Jeremy Corbyn

Doing an interview on Irish radio last week, discussing how it feels to be a "foreigner" in Britain post Brexit (not very good), I got a job offer live on air. I was tempted, but declined. 

The article below will be published on the Huff Post in the next few days. This will be my last blog post for at least 3 weeks. I'm off to retrace my childhood holidays, touring the west coast of Ireland with my family in a campervan. No screens allowed....except for absolute emergencies.

Having opted out of social media because of death threats, I’ve encountered the dark misogyny that seeks to silence opinionated women. So I despaired when I saw this very real malaise being hijacked by prominent Labour MPs, including Heidi Alexander and Angela Eagle, to score points against a man they want to oust. Women in politics face many threats, Jeremy Corbyn isn’t one of them.

Anger expressed as abuse is unacceptable and it’s scandalous that women in public office are subjected to significantly more than their male counterparts (though Blairite Ian Austin’s recent bullying of Corbyn during PMQs was disgraceful). Regarding Labour’s leadership election, all the evidence suggests that members, and the public, are angry at proponents of New Labour - irrespective of gender.

Ordinary people are under constant siege. Relentlessly having to mobilise and ward off threats to our libraries, leisure centres, schools and hospitals. Bit by bit the heart of our communities are being ripped asunder by ruthless, ill-conceived Tory cuts. In this, the country’s hour of greatest need, Labour’s NEC has banned constituency meetings. The wrath unleashed by Labour plc, who fiddle 

while Rome burns, should come as no surprise.

Austerity has hit women twice as hard as men. Women in work are reliant on food banks and skip meals to feed their children. 85% of all the cuts have been at women’s expense and recent research shows violence against women has increased with austerity cuts to domestic violence services.

Is it any wonder the public is angry with Alexander, Eagle, and their New Labour colleagues who back austerity and failed to vote against Tory welfare cuts? It was Tony Blair’s de-regulation of financial services that precipitated the recession, which left the richest, 64% richer and the poorest 56% poorer. Decades of market-based capitalism has left the UK one of the most unequal countries in the OECD. When David Blunkett announced in 1997 that “re-distribution of wealth is no longer an objective of the (New) labour party”, he wasn’t kidding.

Far from getting the £350m a week extra promised for the NHS, within days of Brexit, plans to accelerate the closure of my local A&E were approved.  As the party that founded the NHS, Labour should be providing strong opposition to Tory cuts. That wasn’t the case under Heidi Alexander’s stewardship. Her failure to support Caroline Lucas’ NHS Reinstatement Bill (reversing privatisation) felt like a betrayal to those of us on the front line (mostly women) in a battle for which the stakes couldn’t be higher.

Angela Eagle angered her CLP, who backed Jeremy Corbyn, when she defied them and stood against him. It’s ironic that she called upon Corbyn to resign because he couldn’t command the support of his PLP, yet her own CLP passed a vote of no confidence in her last week.

Anarchy is what happens when those with power abuse the democratic process, not least by stifling and criminalising legitimate dissent.

The £25 membership fee is entirely in keeping with the New Labour exclusive brand, wherein the right to vote was extended only to those who could afford to buy it. Owen Smith, whose proclaimed anti-austerity credentials are risible, didn’t object to the fiscally prohibitive membership fee, despite it discriminating against those most impacted by austerity. Unfortunately for Smith, the public are more discerning than in the Blair era and, having been spun to within an inch of our lives, post Brexit we’re reading the small print.

We can deduce, for example, that Smith is the candidate supported by the right wing Labour group progress who the GMB union accused of instructing Labour’s front bench to support Tory cuts in 2012. Large sums of money have been donated to Progress by corporations such as Pfizer, for whom Smith worked as a lobbyist. Pfizer was recently accused of breaching UK law by increasing the cost of an epilepsy drug by as much as 2,600 percent. As a result, the NHS bill for the drug rose from around £2 annually to more than 40 million in 2014.

In 2006, Smith extolled the virtues of PFI (which is bankrupting the NHS), private sector “choice” in the NHS and academies. He also seemed nonchalant about Iraq.

If New Labour MPs are concerned about the misogyny endured by ordinary women on a daily basis they should denounce austerity, which the New Statesman described as “an economic and cultural assault on women”. They should also countenance the wisdom of Einstein who understood that “Problems cannot be solved with the same mindset that created them”. 

Are “Snakes in Suits” destroying our world? Lessons from Chilcot and Brexit

This blog was published by The Huff Post today. Feel free to share the link & leave a comment.

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/tess-finchlees/learnings-from-chilcot-br_b_11009958.html

The only thing standing between me and loose women is Tony Blair. A promising career in Broadcast media, brought to an abrupt end when I accused Tony of hijacking publicity on Channel 4 news.

At the same time as I was congratulated by the editor for doing “an outstanding job”, my name was being erased from the “expert contributor list”. Number 10 (which I took to be Alistair Campbell), I was later told, had called while I was mid interview demanding that I be ejected from the studio. My criticism of Tony Blair’s handling of the Darfur genocide was, apparently, beyond the pale.

One of the greatest unspoken tragedies of the Iraq war is that Tony Blair, Jack Straw and Hilary Benn turned their backs on the first genocide this century. Resources and troops that should have been deployed as peacekeepers to prevent another Rwanda, had been expended fighting an illegal war in Iraq.

A few months ago, a young Sudanese man, fleeing the genocide in Darfur, was crushed to death by a truck in Calais. Thousands more languish in refugee camps throughout Europe. This is a direct result of Tony Blair’s failed foreign policy.

In between episodes of Benefits Britain and Can’t pay? We’ll take it away, I managed to read the entire Chilcot report into the calamitous Iraq war. There are two recurring presages that emerge in almost all post crises critiques. Group think and psychopathy. In each case, the signs that could have averted catastrophe were missed. Lessons, though documented in post-mortems, are rarely learned.

And so, as with most post disaster autopsies, such as Enron, Challenger, and the global financial crash, there it was in Chilcot’s report. Groupthink. A phenomena wherein “like minded” clones make the big decisions, excluding dissenting views and questioning voices. Every business school and leadership manual in the world warns that decisions made in this way are perilous. Chilcot exposed Blair’s cosy “sofa style” private meetings involving just a handful of unquestioning yes men, from which even members of his own cabinet were excluded.

Instead of toeing the party line, the excluded MPs should have spoken out and demanded more and better evidence. They chose not to do so. They failed to raise the alarm, putting self-interest ahead of the national interest. Sitting Labour MPs who backed Blair’s reckless war should now do the decent thing and resign.

There is a direct causal link between that war and the rise of so-called Islamic State. Many of the terrorist attacks which killed people in Europe and the US in recent years were carried out by young disenfranchised Muslims radicalised by the Iraq war and its aftermath. Of that, there can be no doubt.

The invasion, and the lies about weapons of mass destruction (WMD) used to validate it, have also undermined confidence in political leadership in the West. The Chilcot report documents in shocking detail that the political and governmental structures which planned the invasion were unworthy of public confidence.

The second theme that, although seldom articulated, is invariably evident in post disaster inquiries, is the prevalence of psychopathic leadership behaviours. Dr Robert Hare is an expert in psychopathy. He maintains that people in power tend to score higher in psychopathic dimensions than the rest of us. In his book “Snakes in suits: When psychopaths go to work”, he says psychopaths are motivated by “their own selfish desires, regardless of consequences to others”. He describes them as “superficially charming, manipulative, lying, guilt free, lacking in empathy, ruthless and unwilling to accept responsibility”.

All of these adjectives have been used to describe the behaviours of the main political players post Brexit. Having unleashed a tsunami of hate and havoc on our nation, they abandon the sinking ship without a care in the world for the traumatised souls left drowning in a sea of excrement. Not a single life boat to cling to.

Still living with the devastating consequences of the doomed Iraq invasion, this country has been thrust into yet another cataclysmic, life altering upheaval. With the same hallmarks of groupthink and remorseless psychopathy, I wonder how much more chaos and reckless abandon, this weary world can take.